summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2019-03-22 17:45:29 -0500
committerJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2019-04-08 21:38:48 +0000
commit50f3535d1fb7c377b800e80a838dcfcbda4699df (patch)
tree0d6669d2bd5e32bb602994eac50f2ead2ec09bed /src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c
parent48e48b8560ae6ad1728ced54f8f8f5245b3e99cf (diff)
nir/search: Search for all combinations of commutative ops
Consider the following search expression and NIR sequence: ('iadd', ('imul', a, b), b) ssa_2 = imul ssa_0, ssa_1 ssa_3 = iadd ssa_2, ssa_0 The current algorithm is greedy and, the moment the imul finds a match, it commits those variable names and returns success. In the above example, it maps a -> ssa_0 and b -> ssa_1. When we then try to match the iadd, it sees that ssa_0 is not b and fails to match. The iadd match will attempt to flip itself and try again (which won't work) but it cannot ask the imul to try a flipped match. This commit instead counts the number of commutative ops in each expression and assigns an index to each. It then does a loop and loops over the full combinatorial matrix of commutative operations. In order to keep things sane, we limit it to at most 4 commutative operations (16 combinations). There is only one optimization in opt_algebraic that goes over this limit and it's the bitfieldReverse detection for some UE4 demo. Shader-db results on Kaby Lake: total instructions in shared programs: 15310125 -> 15302469 (-0.05%) instructions in affected programs: 1797123 -> 1789467 (-0.43%) helped: 6751 HURT: 2264 total cycles in shared programs: 357346617 -> 357202526 (-0.04%) cycles in affected programs: 15931005 -> 15786914 (-0.90%) helped: 6024 HURT: 3436 total loops in shared programs: 4360 -> 4360 (0.00%) loops in affected programs: 0 -> 0 helped: 0 HURT: 0 total spills in shared programs: 23675 -> 23666 (-0.04%) spills in affected programs: 235 -> 226 (-3.83%) helped: 5 HURT: 1 total fills in shared programs: 32040 -> 32032 (-0.02%) fills in affected programs: 190 -> 182 (-4.21%) helped: 6 HURT: 2 LOST: 18 GAINED: 5 Reviewed-by: Thomas Helland <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c')
-rw-r--r--src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c61
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 29 deletions
diff --git a/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c b/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c
index d257b639189..df27a2473ee 100644
--- a/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c
+++ b/src/compiler/nir/nir_search.c
@@ -30,9 +30,12 @@
#include "nir_builder.h"
#include "util/half_float.h"
+#define NIR_SEARCH_MAX_COMM_OPS 4
+
struct match_state {
bool inexact_match;
bool has_exact_alu;
+ uint8_t comm_op_direction;
unsigned variables_seen;
nir_alu_src variables[NIR_SEARCH_MAX_VARIABLES];
};
@@ -349,41 +352,25 @@ match_expression(const nir_search_expression *expr, nir_alu_instr *instr,
}
}
- /* Stash off the current variables_seen bitmask. This way we can
- * restore it prior to matching in the commutative case below.
+ /* If this is a commutative expression and it's one of the first few, look
+ * up its direction for the current search operation. We'll use that value
+ * to possibly flip the sources for the match.
*/
- unsigned variables_seen_stash = state->variables_seen;
+ unsigned comm_op_flip =
+ (expr->comm_expr_idx >= 0 &&
+ expr->comm_expr_idx < NIR_SEARCH_MAX_COMM_OPS) ?
+ ((state->comm_op_direction >> expr->comm_expr_idx) & 1) : 0;
bool matched = true;
for (unsigned i = 0; i < nir_op_infos[instr->op].num_inputs; i++) {
- if (!match_value(expr->srcs[i], instr, i, num_components,
- swizzle, state)) {
+ if (!match_value(expr->srcs[i], instr, i ^ comm_op_flip,
+ num_components, swizzle, state)) {
matched = false;
break;
}
}
- if (matched)
- return true;
-
- if (nir_op_infos[instr->op].algebraic_properties & NIR_OP_IS_COMMUTATIVE) {
- assert(nir_op_infos[instr->op].num_inputs == 2);
-
- /* Restore the variables_seen bitmask. If we don't do this, then we
- * could end up with an erroneous failure due to variables found in the
- * first match attempt above not matching those in the second.
- */
- state->variables_seen = variables_seen_stash;
-
- if (!match_value(expr->srcs[0], instr, 1, num_components,
- swizzle, state))
- return false;
-
- return match_value(expr->srcs[1], instr, 0, num_components,
- swizzle, state);
- } else {
- return false;
- }
+ return matched;
}
static unsigned
@@ -513,10 +500,26 @@ nir_replace_instr(nir_builder *build, nir_alu_instr *instr,
struct match_state state;
state.inexact_match = false;
state.has_exact_alu = false;
- state.variables_seen = 0;
- if (!match_expression(search, instr, instr->dest.dest.ssa.num_components,
- swizzle, &state))
+ unsigned comm_expr_combinations =
+ 1 << MIN2(search->comm_exprs, NIR_SEARCH_MAX_COMM_OPS);
+
+ bool found = false;
+ for (unsigned comb = 0; comb < comm_expr_combinations; comb++) {
+ /* The bitfield of directions is just the current iteration. Hooray for
+ * binary.
+ */
+ state.comm_op_direction = comb;
+ state.variables_seen = 0;
+
+ if (match_expression(search, instr,
+ instr->dest.dest.ssa.num_components,
+ swizzle, &state)) {
+ found = true;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!found)
return NULL;
build->cursor = nir_before_instr(&instr->instr);