summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/compiler/glsl/opt_dead_functions.cpp
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2017-11-30 16:55:45 -0800
committerJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2017-12-05 22:01:54 -0800
commit93b4cb61eb2a16794d5f4a2f55a70cdcd8a5d521 (patch)
tree7239b37229dde209befeb98431e90290e2d143c8 /src/compiler/glsl/opt_dead_functions.cpp
parent32c859125b916c24ab76bd52db6e37a1a22f4858 (diff)
spirv: Allow OpPtrAccessChain for block indices
The SPIR-V spec is a bit underspecified when it comes to exactly how you're allowed to use OpPtrAccessChain and what it means in certain edge cases. In particular, what if the base pointer of the OpPtrAccessChain points to the base struct of an SSBO instead of an element in that SSBO. The original variable pointers implementation in mesa assumed that you weren't allowed to do an OpPtrAccessChain that adjusted the block index and asserted such. However, there are some CTS tests that do this and, if the CTS does it, someone will do it in the wild so we should probably handle it. With this commit, we significantly reduce our assumptions and should be able to handle more-or-less anything. The one assumption we still make for correctness is that if we see an OpPtrAccessChain on a pointer to a struct decorated block that the block index should be adjusted. In theory, someone could try to put an array stride on such a pointer and try to make the SSBO an implicit array of the base struct and we would not give them what they want. That said, any index other than 0 would count as an out-of-bounds access which is invalid. Reviewed-by: Kristian H. Kristensen <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/compiler/glsl/opt_dead_functions.cpp')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions