diff options
| author | Dave Airlie <[email protected]> | 2019-07-18 16:12:53 +1000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Dave Airlie <[email protected]> | 2019-07-18 16:24:44 +1000 |
| commit | a68f593a0e1f8280bfbfaaeb72c7c256dee622b4 (patch) | |
| tree | 4fc8730ec91bd92ce0fd5a1ea66de7bef57f3b11 /src/amd/vulkan | |
| parent | 45951452aa2b2527e13192208cc7f3520bb54478 (diff) | |
radv: put back VGT_FLUSH at ring init on gfx10
I can find no evidence that removing this is a good idea.
Fixes: 9b116173b6a ("radv: do not emit VGT_FLUSH on GFX10")
Reviewed-by: Samuel Pitoiset <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/amd/vulkan')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c | 6 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c index b397a9a8aa0..8dd24cb8192 100644 --- a/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c +++ b/src/amd/vulkan/radv_device.c @@ -2753,10 +2753,8 @@ radv_get_preamble_cs(struct radv_queue *queue, radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_EVENT_WRITE, 0, 0)); radeon_emit(cs, EVENT_TYPE(V_028A90_VS_PARTIAL_FLUSH) | EVENT_INDEX(4)); - if (queue->device->physical_device->rad_info.chip_class < GFX10) { - radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_EVENT_WRITE, 0, 0)); - radeon_emit(cs, EVENT_TYPE(V_028A90_VGT_FLUSH) | EVENT_INDEX(0)); - } + radeon_emit(cs, PKT3(PKT3_EVENT_WRITE, 0, 0)); + radeon_emit(cs, EVENT_TYPE(V_028A90_VGT_FLUSH) | EVENT_INDEX(0)); } radv_emit_gs_ring_sizes(queue, cs, esgs_ring_bo, esgs_ring_size, |