diff options
author | Marek Olšák <[email protected]> | 2019-05-14 22:16:20 -0400 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marek Olšák <[email protected]> | 2019-05-15 20:54:10 -0400 |
commit | ccfcb9d818b40564001b3cf2516367526de26c1d (patch) | |
tree | 635e075d82a6793001a8982866684e36be61d4d8 /src/amd/common/ac_gpu_info.h | |
parent | e5cc363f43ba3e4b0800dc1e4fae1395f65a1275 (diff) |
ac: rename SI-CIK-VI to GFX6-GFX7-GFX8
Acked-by: Dave Airlie <[email protected]>
We already use GFX9 and I don't want us to have confusing naming
in the driver. GFXn naming is better from the driver perspective,
because it's the real version of the gfx portion of the hw. Also,
CIK means Bonaire-Kaveri-Kabini, it doesn't mean CI.
It shouldn't confuse our SDMA, UVD, VCE etc. code much. Those have
nothing to do with GFXn and they have their own version numbers.
Diffstat (limited to 'src/amd/common/ac_gpu_info.h')
-rw-r--r-- | src/amd/common/ac_gpu_info.h | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/amd/common/ac_gpu_info.h b/src/amd/common/ac_gpu_info.h index 946c2df82d0..11fb77eee87 100644 --- a/src/amd/common/ac_gpu_info.h +++ b/src/amd/common/ac_gpu_info.h @@ -183,7 +183,7 @@ static inline unsigned ac_get_max_simd_waves(enum radeon_family family) static inline uint32_t ac_get_num_physical_sgprs(enum chip_class chip_class) { - return chip_class >= VI ? 800 : 512; + return chip_class >= GFX8 ? 800 : 512; } #ifdef __cplusplus |