summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/include/CL
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorPaul Berry <[email protected]>2013-11-12 10:55:18 -0800
committerPaul Berry <[email protected]>2013-11-15 08:54:15 -0800
commitb4c3b833ec8ec6787658ea90365ff565cd8846c7 (patch)
treea7488b09e0da6899d665f97cca4166b396fd9acd /include/CL
parent46e9f78efcb6ccc25ea59d83624aaa5077254a85 (diff)
i965: Fix vertical alignment for multisampled buffers.
From the Sandy Bridge PRM, Vol 1 Part 1 7.18.3.4 (Alignment Unit Size): j [vertical alignment] = 4 for any render target surface is multisampled (4x) From the Ivy Bridge PRM, Vol 4 Part 1 2.12.2.1 (SURFACE_STATE for most messages), under the "Surface Vertical Alignment" heading: This field is intended to be set to VALIGN_4 if the surface was rendered as a depth buffer, for a multisampled (4x) render target, or for a multisampled (8x) render target, since these surfaces support only alignment of 4. Back in 2012 when we added multisampling support to the i965 driver, we forgot to update the logic for computing the vertical alignment, so we were often using a vertical alignment of 2 for multisampled buffers, leading to subtle rendering errors. Note that the specs also require a vertical alignment of 4 for all Y-tiled render target surfaces; I plan to address that in a separate patch. Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53077 Cc: [email protected] Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'include/CL')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions