diff options
author | Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> | 2012-08-10 10:26:03 -0700 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> | 2012-08-12 20:12:13 -0700 |
commit | 9da50667f490ba2c6240f4c91c9707e3f181adae (patch) | |
tree | caae15ed5579ce228c0a5c8fc30c65738a1aee69 /docs/MESA_drm_image.spec | |
parent | 006c1a3c652803e2ff8d5f7ea55c9cb5d8353279 (diff) |
intel: Move finish_batch() call before MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END and padding.
On Gen4+, brw_finish_batch() calls brw_emit_query_end(), which emits
some extra PIPE_CONTROLs to capture the current occlusion query data.
Unfortunately, it was being called *after* _intel_batchbuffer_flush
added the MI_BATCH_BUFFER_END, meaning those PIPE_CONTROLs didn't get
inside the batch.
Not only does this likely cause bogus occlusion query values, it can
also cause crashes: with the recent change to use 64-bit depth count
writes on Gen6+, we started emitting an odd-length PIPE_CONTROL, which
happened after the MI_NOOP padding. This resulted in an odd-length
batch buffer, which resulted in execbuf2 returning -EINVAL and the
application dying with an intel_do_flush_locked failure.
On older generations, finish_batch() doesn't emit any state, so this
change shouldn't have any effect.
Huge thanks to Chris Wilson for helping me figure this out.
NOTE: This is a candidate for stable release branches.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53311
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <[email protected]>
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/MESA_drm_image.spec')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions