summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorKenneth Graunke <[email protected]>2013-09-23 13:37:00 -0700
committerKenneth Graunke <[email protected]>2013-09-26 16:55:18 -0700
commitaac75f877da1d106f6fd7bbd238d1d1d35a0c8e8 (patch)
treea212f3b66ca6aed8cdfceeede761215e39f2b4ff
parente5c49bc25b07b76dbcf577186484ab271114c48a (diff)
i965/fs: Don't double-accept operands of logical and/or/xor operations.
If the argument to emit_bool_to_cond_code() is an ir_expression, we loop over the operands, calling accept() on each of them, which generates assembly code to compute that subexpression. We then emit one or two final instruction that perform the top-level operation on those operands. If it's not an expression (say, a boolean-valued variable), we simply call accept() on the whole value. In commit 80ecb8f1 (i965/fs: Avoid generating extra AND instructions on bool logic ops), Eric made logic operations jump out of the expression path to the non-expression path. Unfortunately, this meant that we would first accept() the two operands, skip generating any code that used them, then accept() the whole expression, generating code for the operands a second time. Dead code elimination would always remove the first set of redundant operand assembly, since nothing actually used them. But we shouldn't generate it in the first place. Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp11
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
index 3d25fe3eca5..72c379a20c3 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_fs_visitor.cpp
@@ -1724,7 +1724,10 @@ fs_visitor::emit_bool_to_cond_code(ir_rvalue *ir)
{
ir_expression *expr = ir->as_expression();
- if (expr) {
+ if (expr &&
+ expr->operation != ir_binop_logic_and &&
+ expr->operation != ir_binop_logic_or &&
+ expr->operation != ir_binop_logic_xor) {
fs_reg op[2];
fs_inst *inst;
@@ -1744,11 +1747,6 @@ fs_visitor::emit_bool_to_cond_code(ir_rvalue *ir)
inst->conditional_mod = BRW_CONDITIONAL_Z;
break;
- case ir_binop_logic_xor:
- case ir_binop_logic_or:
- case ir_binop_logic_and:
- goto out;
-
case ir_unop_f2b:
if (brw->gen >= 6) {
emit(CMP(reg_null_d, op[0], fs_reg(0.0f), BRW_CONDITIONAL_NZ));
@@ -1790,7 +1788,6 @@ fs_visitor::emit_bool_to_cond_code(ir_rvalue *ir)
return;
}
-out:
ir->accept(this);
fs_inst *inst = emit(AND(reg_null_d, this->result, fs_reg(1)));