summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2018-01-13 10:59:05 -0800
committerJason Ekstrand <[email protected]>2018-02-20 13:49:25 -0800
commit7d5f6b6088e1fd46560b1e2fe6f1b1c05687540a (patch)
treeeeae39968a6c5a67c09bc6387b1997f355e17136
parent8a3f086a42b643e33310ad8b9dbe63c57d6620b9 (diff)
anv/cmd_buffer: Mark depth/stencil surfaces written in begin_subpass
Reviewed-by: Nanley Chery <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r--src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c50
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c b/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
index 1b1bf56a6fa..d11eca6d71d 100644
--- a/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
+++ b/src/intel/vulkan/genX_cmd_buffer.c
@@ -3284,27 +3284,6 @@ cmd_buffer_emit_depth_stencil(struct anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer)
isl_emit_depth_stencil_hiz_s(&device->isl_dev, dw, &info);
cmd_buffer->state.hiz_enabled = info.hiz_usage == ISL_AUX_USAGE_HIZ;
-
- /* We may be writing depth or stencil so we need to mark the surface.
- * Unfortunately, there's no way to know at this point whether the depth or
- * stencil tests used will actually write to the surface.
- */
- if (image && (image->aspects & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT)) {
- genX(cmd_buffer_mark_image_written)(cmd_buffer, image,
- VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT,
- info.hiz_usage,
- info.view->base_level,
- info.view->base_array_layer,
- info.view->array_len);
- }
- if (image && (image->aspects & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT)) {
- genX(cmd_buffer_mark_image_written)(cmd_buffer, image,
- VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT,
- ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE,
- info.view->base_level,
- info.view->base_array_layer,
- info.view->array_len);
- }
}
@@ -3590,6 +3569,35 @@ cmd_buffer_begin_subpass(struct anv_cmd_buffer *cmd_buffer,
iview->planes[0].isl.base_level,
iview->planes[0].isl.base_array_layer,
fb->layers);
+ } else if (subpass->attachments[i].usage ==
+ VK_IMAGE_USAGE_DEPTH_STENCIL_ATTACHMENT_BIT) {
+ /* We may be writing depth or stencil so we need to mark the surface.
+ * Unfortunately, there's no way to know at this point whether the
+ * depth or stencil tests used will actually write to the surface.
+ *
+ * Even though stencil may be plane 1, it always shares a base_level
+ * with depth.
+ */
+ const struct isl_view *ds_view = &iview->planes[0].isl;
+ if (iview->aspect_mask & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT) {
+ genX(cmd_buffer_mark_image_written)(cmd_buffer, image,
+ VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_DEPTH_BIT,
+ att_state->aux_usage,
+ ds_view->base_level,
+ ds_view->base_array_layer,
+ fb->layers);
+ }
+ if (iview->aspect_mask & VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT) {
+ /* Even though stencil may be plane 1, it always shares a
+ * base_level with depth.
+ */
+ genX(cmd_buffer_mark_image_written)(cmd_buffer, image,
+ VK_IMAGE_ASPECT_STENCIL_BIT,
+ ISL_AUX_USAGE_NONE,
+ ds_view->base_level,
+ ds_view->base_array_layer,
+ fb->layers);
+ }
}
att_state->pending_clear_aspects = 0;