diff options
author | Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> | 2014-12-10 00:52:50 -0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> | 2014-12-12 23:21:27 -0800 |
commit | 23caba862a001f82ef352307a79bebf7ef910959 (patch) | |
tree | 0b3da309c34afc9677890cb7ae19d06190ee149f | |
parent | a3218e65d1e52469421226a17f2ba91a6b3e4bb8 (diff) |
i965/vec4: Drop writemasks on scratch reads.
This code is complete nonsense and has apparently existed since I first
implemented register spilling in the VS two years ago.
Scratch reads are SEND messages, which ignore the destination writemask.
The comment about "data that may not have been written to scratch" is
also confusing - we always spill whole 4x2 registers, so such data
simply does not exist. We can safely ignore the writemask.
Signed-off-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matt Turner <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r-- | src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp | 8 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp index 828a70e2752..e8e2185ac1a 100644 --- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp +++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/i965/brw_vec4_reg_allocate.cpp @@ -335,14 +335,6 @@ vec4_visitor::spill_reg(int spill_reg_nr) inst->src[i].reg = virtual_grf_alloc(1); dst_reg temp = dst_reg(inst->src[i]); - /* Only read the necessary channels, to avoid overwriting the rest - * with data that may not have been written to scratch. - */ - temp.writemask = 0; - for (int c = 0; c < 4; c++) - temp.writemask |= (1 << BRW_GET_SWZ(inst->src[i].swizzle, c)); - assert(temp.writemask != 0); - emit_scratch_read(block, inst, temp, spill_reg, spill_offset); } } |