summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorVinson Lee <[email protected]>2010-09-29 14:13:49 -0700
committerVinson Lee <[email protected]>2010-09-29 14:13:49 -0700
commit7c7fdef3b1cfa0db7ec3eb45e39d72ca60753f30 (patch)
treebf801b941c23b6d5da6c7cfac6076af7ee2b11c7
parentae664daa25ac230e3a97cae0b82b7cd3c392c4bb (diff)
r300/compiler: Move declaration before code.
Fixes these GCC warnings on linux-x86 build. r500_fragprog_emit.c: In function ‘emit_paired’: r500_fragprog_emit.c:237: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code r500_fragprog_emit.c: In function ‘emit_tex’: r500_fragprog_emit.c:367: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code r500_fragprog_emit.c: In function ‘emit_flowcontrol’: r500_fragprog_emit.c:415: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code r500_fragprog_emit.c: In function ‘r500BuildFragmentProgramHwCode’: r500_fragprog_emit.c:633: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code
-rw-r--r--src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/r500_fragprog_emit.c14
1 files changed, 10 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/r500_fragprog_emit.c b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/r500_fragprog_emit.c
index 407d92531a5..6f101c68eb6 100644
--- a/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/r500_fragprog_emit.c
+++ b/src/mesa/drivers/dri/r300/compiler/r500_fragprog_emit.c
@@ -227,6 +227,7 @@ static void alu_nop(struct r300_fragment_program_compiler *c, int ip)
*/
static void emit_paired(struct r300_fragment_program_compiler *c, struct rc_pair_instruction *inst)
{
+ int ip;
PROG_CODE;
if (code->inst_end >= c->Base.max_alu_insts-1) {
@@ -234,7 +235,7 @@ static void emit_paired(struct r300_fragment_program_compiler *c, struct rc_pair
return;
}
- int ip = ++code->inst_end;
+ ip = ++code->inst_end;
/* Quirk: MDH/MDV (DDX/DDY) need a NOP on previous non-TEX instructions. */
if (inst->RGB.Opcode == RC_OPCODE_DDX || inst->Alpha.Opcode == RC_OPCODE_DDX ||
@@ -357,6 +358,7 @@ static unsigned int translate_strq_swizzle(unsigned int swizzle)
*/
static int emit_tex(struct r300_fragment_program_compiler *c, struct rc_sub_instruction *inst)
{
+ int ip;
PROG_CODE;
if (code->inst_end >= c->Base.max_alu_insts-1) {
@@ -364,7 +366,7 @@ static int emit_tex(struct r300_fragment_program_compiler *c, struct rc_sub_inst
return 0;
}
- int ip = ++code->inst_end;
+ ip = ++code->inst_end;
code->inst[ip].inst0 = R500_INST_TYPE_TEX
| (inst->DstReg.WriteMask << 11)
@@ -407,12 +409,14 @@ static int emit_tex(struct r300_fragment_program_compiler *c, struct rc_sub_inst
static void emit_flowcontrol(struct emit_state * s, struct rc_instruction * inst)
{
+ unsigned int newip;
+
if (s->Code->inst_end >= s->C->max_alu_insts-1) {
rc_error(s->C, "emit_tex: Too many instructions");
return;
}
- unsigned int newip = ++s->Code->inst_end;
+ newip = ++s->Code->inst_end;
/* Currently all loops use the same integer constant to intialize
* the loop variables. */
@@ -623,6 +627,8 @@ void r500BuildFragmentProgramHwCode(struct radeon_compiler *c, void *user)
if (code->inst_end == -1 ||
(code->inst[code->inst_end].inst0 & R500_INST_TYPE_MASK) != R500_INST_TYPE_OUT) {
+ int ip;
+
/* This may happen when dead-code elimination is disabled or
* when most of the fragment program logic is leading to a KIL */
if (code->inst_end >= compiler->Base.max_alu_insts-1) {
@@ -630,7 +636,7 @@ void r500BuildFragmentProgramHwCode(struct radeon_compiler *c, void *user)
return;
}
- int ip = ++code->inst_end;
+ ip = ++code->inst_end;
code->inst[ip].inst0 = R500_INST_TYPE_OUT | R500_INST_TEX_SEM_WAIT;
}