diff options
author | Marek Olšák <[email protected]> | 2016-01-13 18:42:02 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Marek Olšák <[email protected]> | 2016-01-14 19:55:41 +0100 |
commit | dc96a18d24409102e36cdfd7de0552f66c3925bf (patch) | |
tree | ddbf414e6ed7b36383a6f1650aa890a86c491d37 | |
parent | 6303231a1ddf646b05c43c6bbc7fa71314ebb3fc (diff) |
radeonsi: don't miss changes to SPI_TMPRING_SIZE
I'm not sure about the consequences of this bug, but it's definitely
dangerous.
This applies to SI, CIK, VI.
Cc: 11.0 11.1 <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nicolai Hähnle <[email protected]>
-rw-r--r-- | src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c | 9 |
1 files changed, 7 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c index 35b226f0157..8ff70b44d45 100644 --- a/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c +++ b/src/gallium/drivers/radeonsi/si_state_shaders.c @@ -1317,6 +1317,7 @@ static bool si_update_spi_tmpring_size(struct si_context *sctx) si_get_max_scratch_bytes_per_wave(sctx); unsigned scratch_needed_size = scratch_bytes_per_wave * sctx->scratch_waves; + unsigned spi_tmpring_size; int r; if (scratch_needed_size > 0) { @@ -1386,8 +1387,12 @@ static bool si_update_spi_tmpring_size(struct si_context *sctx) assert((scratch_needed_size & ~0x3FF) == scratch_needed_size && "scratch size should already be aligned correctly."); - sctx->spi_tmpring_size = S_0286E8_WAVES(sctx->scratch_waves) | - S_0286E8_WAVESIZE(scratch_bytes_per_wave >> 10); + spi_tmpring_size = S_0286E8_WAVES(sctx->scratch_waves) | + S_0286E8_WAVESIZE(scratch_bytes_per_wave >> 10); + if (spi_tmpring_size != sctx->spi_tmpring_size) { + sctx->spi_tmpring_size = spi_tmpring_size; + sctx->emit_scratch_reloc = true; + } return true; } |