diff options
| author | Chris Forbes <[email protected]> | 2014-04-12 19:44:46 +1200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]> | 2014-04-18 10:35:05 -0700 |
| commit | 92840aabf7a96583619a01a8257ef6f117f0ca50 (patch) | |
| tree | 92bd198ebcf410d7a6d40d4a45493fc1865ade66 | |
| parent | 7489f3eedafbdad905158196873c8b3f5ccb546f (diff) | |
glsl: Allow explicit binding on atomics again
As of 943b2d52bf5, layout(binding) on an atomic would fail the assertion
here.
Signed-off-by: Chris Forbes <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Kenneth Graunke <[email protected]>
| -rw-r--r-- | src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp | 4 |
1 files changed, 3 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp b/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp index e60bb64bcdc..2100e051716 100644 --- a/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp +++ b/src/glsl/link_uniform_initializers.cpp @@ -296,8 +296,10 @@ link_set_uniform_initializers(struct gl_shader_program *prog) linker::set_block_binding(prog, iface_type->name, var->data.binding); } + } else if (type->contains_atomic()) { + /* we don't actually need to do anything. */ } else { - assert(!"Explicit binding not on a sampler or UBO."); + assert(!"Explicit binding not on a sampler, UBO or atomic."); } } else if (var->constant_value) { linker::set_uniform_initializer(mem_ctx, prog, var->name, |