| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Pretty much useless and unused, except for listing the module names in
build.h and the short versions totally suffice for that.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
just too fragile and not that useful. Something like Java's checked exceptions
might be nice, but simply killing the process entirely if an unexpected
exception is thrown is not exactly useful for something trying to be robust.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
the info.txt files with the right module dependencies.
Apply it across the codebase.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
up during the Fedora submission review, that each source file include some
text about the license. One handy Perl script later and each file now has
the line
Distributed under the terms of the Botan license
after the copyright notices.
While I was in there modifying every file anyway, I also stripped out the
remainder of the block comments (lots of astericks before and after the
text); this is stylistic thing I picked up when I was first learning C++
but in retrospect it is not a good style as the structure makes it harder
to modify comments (with the result that comments become fewer, shorter and
are less likely to be updated, which are not good things).
|
| |
|
|
| |
conflicts/collisions
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It turned out many files were including base.h merely to get other
includes (like types.h, secmem.h, and exceptn.h). Those have been changed
to directly include the files containing the declarations that code needs.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
them modules now. In any case there is no distinction so info.txt seems
better.
|
| |
|
