| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
Replace C++98 style private copy constructors/assignment ops with ones
annotated with delete.
|
| |
|
|
| |
Plus a few minor cleanups.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
using a custom allocator. Currently our allocator just does new/delete
with a memset before deletion, and the mmap and mlock allocators have
been removed.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the parameters of the key length. Instead define a new function which
returns a simple object which contains this information.
This definitely breaks backwards compatability, though only with code
that directly manipulates low level objects like BlockCipher*s
directly, which is probably relatively rare.
Also remove some deprecated accessor functions from lookup.h. It turns
out block_size_of and output_size_of are being used in the TLS code; I
need to remove them from there before I can delete these entirely.
Really that didn't make much sense, because they assumed all
implementations of a particular algorithm will have the same
specifications, which is definitely not necessarily true, especially
WRT key length. It is much safer (and probably simpler) to first
retrieve an instance of the actual object you are going to use and
then ask it directly.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
just too fragile and not that useful. Something like Java's checked exceptions
might be nice, but simply killing the process entirely if an unexpected
exception is thrown is not exactly useful for something trying to be robust.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
up during the Fedora submission review, that each source file include some
text about the license. One handy Perl script later and each file now has
the line
Distributed under the terms of the Botan license
after the copyright notices.
While I was in there modifying every file anyway, I also stripped out the
remainder of the block comments (lots of astericks before and after the
text); this is stylistic thing I picked up when I was first learning C++
but in retrospect it is not a good style as the structure makes it harder
to modify comments (with the result that comments become fewer, shorter and
are less likely to be updated, which are not good things).
|
| |
|
|
| |
conflicts/collisions
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
It turned out many files were including base.h merely to get other
includes (like types.h, secmem.h, and exceptn.h). Those have been changed
to directly include the files containing the declarations that code needs.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
