| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
This caused Doxygen to think this was markup meant for it, which really
caused some clutter in the namespace page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
and don't even have access to a VIA with AES so could not test it anyway.
If someone else wants to do it, then the implementation for AES-NI should
provide a good template.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
Move most of the engine headers to internal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Currently requires SSE4.1 for _mm_extract_epi32 for the key schedule, it
would be nice to remove this dependency, though all currently known/scheduled
chips with AES-NI (Intel Westmere and Sandy Bridge, and AMD Bulldozer) are
supposed to include SSE 4.1 so this is not a huge problem.
|
|
|
|
| |
which is currently just a stub returning false.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
tests under Intel's emulator.
Document and enable in the engine.
Merge both versions to aes_intel.cpp - some shared code and much similiar
structure which might be sharable via macros.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
on a particular ISA extension rather than a list of CPUs. Much
easier to edit and audit, too. Add markers on the AES-NI code and
SHA-1/SSE2. Serpent and XTEA don't need it because they are
generic and only depend on simd_32 which will silenty swap out a
scalar version if SSE2/AltiVec isn't enabled (since it turns out
on supersclar processors just doing 4 blocks in parallel can be a
win even in GPRs).
Add pentium3 to the list of CPUs with rdtsc, was missing. Odd!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
From looking at how key gen works in particular, it seems easiest to provide
only AES-128, AES-192, and AES-256 and not a general AES class that can
accept any key length. This also has the bonus of allowing full loop unrolling
which may be a win (how much so will depend on the latency/throughput of
the AES instructions which is currently unknown).
No block interleaving, though of course it works very nicely here, simply
due to the desire to keep things simple until what is currently here can
actually be tested. (Intel has an emulator that is supposed to work but
just crashes on my machine...)
I'm not entirely sure if byte swapping is required. Intel has a white paper
out that suggests it isn't (and really it would have been stupid of them to
not build this into the aes instructions), but who knows. If it turns
out to be necessary there is a pretty fast bswap instruction for SSE anyway.
|
|
providing it. Also stubs in the engine for VIA's AES instructions, but
needs CPUID checking also.
|