| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |\
| |
| |
| |
| |
| | |
63b5a20eab129ca13287fda33d2d02eec329708f)
to branch 'net.randombit.botan' (head 8b8150f09c55184f028f2929c4e7f7cd0d46d96e)
|
| |/
|
|
|
| |
would be fixed but it's quite hard to do, makes more sense for now to
merge then back into one big x509 blog.
|
| |
|
|
| |
dependent right now.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the user to specify the hash function to use, instead of always using SHA-1.
This was a sensible default a few years ago, when there wasn't a ~2^60 attack
on SHA-1 and support for SHA-2 was pretty much nil, but using something else
makes a lot more sense these days.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
up during the Fedora submission review, that each source file include some
text about the license. One handy Perl script later and each file now has
the line
Distributed under the terms of the Botan license
after the copyright notices.
While I was in there modifying every file anyway, I also stripped out the
remainder of the block comments (lots of astericks before and after the
text); this is stylistic thing I picked up when I was first learning C++
but in retrospect it is not a good style as the structure makes it harder
to modify comments (with the result that comments become fewer, shorter and
are less likely to be updated, which are not good things).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
