| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
compatability with 1.8, but actually the signature is completely
different anyway because that version took a Timer object, which
doesn't exist at all anymore.
I suppose I could add an empty Timer class plus subclasses, let
someone instantiate it and pass it in, ignoring it, but I'm not
feeling this is worth the effort. It would make more sense to add a
version with this signature to 1.8, which creates a
Default_Benchmark_Timer and uses it.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
16 KiB buffer. Also reorder the parameters to make somewhat more sense, with the
first arguments being totally mandatory and the later ones potentially optional.
Provide inlined version matching the old interface that just forwards to the
new call, marking it as deprecated.
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
This caused Doxygen to think this was markup meant for it, which really
caused some clutter in the namespace page.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
QueryPerformanceCounter, into an entropy source hres_timer. Its
results, if any, do not count as contributing entropy to the poll.
Convert the other (monotonic/fixed epoch) timers to a single function
get_nanoseconds_clock(), living in time.h, which statically chooses
the 'best' timer type (clock_gettime, gettimeofday, std::clock, in
that order depending on what is available). Add feature test macros
for clock_gettime and gettimeofday.
Remove the Timer class and timer.h. Remove the Timer& argument to the
algorithm benchmark function.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
up during the Fedora submission review, that each source file include some
text about the license. One handy Perl script later and each file now has
the line
Distributed under the terms of the Botan license
after the copyright notices.
While I was in there modifying every file anyway, I also stripped out the
remainder of the block comments (lots of astericks before and after the
text); this is stylistic thing I picked up when I was first learning C++
but in retrospect it is not a good style as the structure makes it harder
to modify comments (with the result that comments become fewer, shorter and
are less likely to be updated, which are not good things).
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
|
| |
timer alternatives. I realized otherwise each application would be forced
to do the exact same thing, and no reason for that.
|
| | |
|
| |
|
