| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
up during the Fedora submission review, that each source file include some
text about the license. One handy Perl script later and each file now has
the line
Distributed under the terms of the Botan license
after the copyright notices.
While I was in there modifying every file anyway, I also stripped out the
remainder of the block comments (lots of astericks before and after the
text); this is stylistic thing I picked up when I was first learning C++
but in retrospect it is not a good style as the structure makes it harder
to modify comments (with the result that comments become fewer, shorter and
are less likely to be updated, which are not good things).
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
on Solaris 10 with GCC 3.4.3.
First, remove the definition of _XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED=1 in mmap_mem.cpp
and unix_cmd.cpp, because apparently on Solaris defining this macro breaks
C++ compilation entirely with GCC:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6395191
In es_egd.cpp and es_dev.cpp, include <fcntl.h> to get the declaration of
open(), which is apparently where open(2) lives on Solaris - this matches
the include the *BSD man pages for open(2) show, though AFAIK the BSDs
all compiled fine without it (probably due to greater efforts to be
source-compatible with Linux systems by *BSD developers).
I have not been able to test these changes personally on Solaris but
Rickard reports that with these changes everything compiles OK.
Update lib version to 1.8.0-pre. ZOMG. Finally.
|
|
|
|
| |
avoid a potential integer overflow in the multiplication. Fixes bugid 27
|
|
|
|
| |
Add some missing info.txts
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
code to alloc/ subdirs
|
| |
|
|
|