| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
most Intel Core Duo (32 bit, as opposed to Core 2 Duo being 64 bit).
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the submodel it is referencing - this is usually more recognizable.
Suggested by Markus Wanner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
of /proc/cpuinfo in configure.pl
This is probably only useful for testing.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
bad results, especially noticable with fast algorithms and long test times.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
the wrong one in some situation or another. Just print milliseconds
no matter what.
Also it's easier to read/compare if everything is in the same unit (obv)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
several are failing with an uncaught exception.
The test failures may be due to the fact that ECDSA's support for EAC is not
included at the moment, and the CVC code that attempts to do it is #if'ed out.
It certainly can't help anyway. Exception is a decoding error, so seems
quite plausible.
|
|\
| |
| |
| | |
and 'a70931899dfcc15fe8aa2ace40712717859afe50'
|
| | |
|
| |
| |
| |
| | |
mp_asmi.h
|
|/
|
|
| |
brackets)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
rather than silently ignoring it.
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
(tests by Falko Strenzke)
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
virtuals)
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|