diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/pubkey.txt')
-rw-r--r-- | doc/pubkey.txt | 166 |
1 files changed, 68 insertions, 98 deletions
diff --git a/doc/pubkey.txt b/doc/pubkey.txt index 254880f65..2089434d6 100644 --- a/doc/pubkey.txt +++ b/doc/pubkey.txt @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ operations, like key agreement, the two keys *must* use the same group. There are currently two kinds of discrete logarithm groups supported in botan: the integers modulo a prime, represented by :ref:`dl_group`, and elliptic curves in GF(p), represented by -:ref:`ec_dompar`. A rough generalization is that the larger the group +:ref:`ec_group`. A rough generalization is that the larger the group is, the more secure the algorithm is, but coorespondingly the slower the operations will be. @@ -74,30 +74,14 @@ Nyberg-Rueppel key pairs with value. Normally, you would leave the value as zero, letting the class generate a new random key. -Finally, given an ``EC_Domain_Params`` object, you can create a new +Finally, given an ``EC_Group`` object, you can create a new ECDSA, ECDH, or GOST 34.10 private key with -.. cpp:function:: ECDSA_PrivateKey::ECDSA_PrivateKey(RandomNumberGenerator& rng, const EC_Domain_Params& domain) +.. cpp:function:: ECDSA_PrivateKey::ECDSA_PrivateKey(RandomNumberGenerator& rng, const EC_Group& domain, const BigInt& x = 0) -.. cpp:function:: ECDH_PrivateKey::ECDH_PrivateKey(RandomNumberGenerator& rng, const EC_Domain_Params& domain) +.. cpp:function:: ECDH_PrivateKey::ECDH_PrivateKey(RandomNumberGenerator& rng, const EC_Group& domain, const BigInt& x = 0) -.. cpp:function:: GOST_3410_PrivateKey::GOST_3410_PrivateKey(RandomNumberGenerator& rng, const EC_Domain_Params& domain) - -Unlike the integer modulo a prime key types, the constructor that takes a -predefined ``BigInt`` private key value is different: - -.. cpp:function:: ECDSA_PrivateKey::ECDSA_PrivateKey(const EC_Domain_Params& domain, const BigInt& x) - -.. cpp:function:: ECDH_PrivateKey::ECDH_PrivateKey(const EC_Domain_Params& domain, const BigInt& x) - -.. cpp:function:: GOST_3410_PrivateKey::GOST_3410_PrivateKey(const EC_Domain_Params& domain, const BigInt& x) - -.. note:: - - It is likely that these constructors will be removed in a future - release, and a third optional parameter will be added to the - constructors described above, to match the integer modulo prime - versions. Only use them if you really need them. +.. cpp:function:: GOST_3410_PrivateKey::GOST_3410_PrivateKey(RandomNumberGenerator& rng, const EC_Group& domain, const BigInt& x = 0) .. _serializing_private_keys: @@ -274,12 +258,12 @@ You can reload a serialized group using .. cpp:function:: void DL_Group::PEM_decode(DataSource& source) -.. _ec_dompar: +.. _ec_group: -EC_Domain_Params +EC_Group ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ -An ``EC_Domain_Params`` is initialized by passing the name of the +An ``EC_Group`` is initialized by passing the name of the group to be used to the constructor. These groups have semi-standardized names like "secp256r1" and "brainpool512r1". @@ -305,96 +289,82 @@ Each public key type has a function checking, which includes expensive operations like primality checking. -Getting a PK algorithm object +Encryption --------------------------------- -The key types, like ``RSA_PrivateKey``, do not implement any kind of -padding or encoding (which is necessary for security). To get an -object that knows how to do padding, use the wrapper classes included -in ``pubkey.h``. These take a key, along with a string that specifies -what hashing and encoding method(s) to use. Examples of such strings -are "EME1(SHA-256)" for OAEP encryption and "EMSA4(SHA-256)" for PSS -signatures (where the message is hashed using SHA-256). +Safe public key encryption requires the use of a padding scheme which +hides the underlying mathematical properties of the algorithm. +Additionally, they will add randomness, so encrypting the same +plaintext twice produces two different ciphertexts. -Here are some basic examples (using an RSA key) to give you a feel for -the possibilities. These examples assume ``rsakey`` is an -``RSA_PrivateKey``, since otherwise we would not be able to create -a decryption or signature object with it (you can create encryption or -signature verification objects with public keys, naturally):: +The primary interface for encryption is ``PK_Encryptor``, which +provides the following interface: - // PKCS #1 v2.0 / IEEE 1363 compatible encryption - PK_Encryptor_EME rsa_enc_pkcs1_v2(rsakey, "EME1(SHA-1)"); - // PKCS #1 v1.5 compatible encryption - PK_Encryptor_EME rsa_enc_pkcs1_v15(rsakey, "PKCS1v15") +.. cpp:function:: SecureVector<byte> PK_Encryptor::encrypt(const byte in[], size_t length, RandomNumberGenerator& rng) const - // This object can decrypt things encrypted by rsa_ - PK_Decryptor_EME rsa_dec_pkcs1_v2(rsakey, "EME1(SHA-1)"); +.. cpp:function:: SecureVector<byte> PK_Encryptor::encrypt(const MemoryRegion<byte>& in, RandomNumberGenerator& rng) const - // PKCS #1 v1.5 compatible signatures - PK_Signer rsa_sign_pkcs1_v15(rsakey, "EMSA3(MD5)"); - PK_Verifier rsa_verify_pkcs1_v15(rsakey, "EMSA3(MD5)"); - // PKCS #1 v2.1 compatible signatures - PK_Signer rsa_sign_pkcs1_v2(rsakey, "EMSA4(SHA-1)"); - PK_Verifier rsa_verify_pkcs1_v2(rsakey, "EMSA4(SHA-1)"); +.. cpp:function:: size_t PK_Encryptor::maximum_input_size() const -Encryption ---------------------------------- + This function returns the maximum size of the message that can + be processed, in bytes. If you call ``encrypt`` with a value + larger than this the operation will fail with an exception. + +``PK_Encryptor`` is only an interface; to use one you have to create +an implementation; there are currently two availabie in the library, +``PK_Encryptor_EME`` and ``DLIES_Encryptor``. DLIES is a standard +method (from IEEE 1363) that uses a key agreement technique such as DH +or ECDH to perform message encryption. Normally, public key encryption +is done using algorithms which support it directly, such as RSA or +ElGamal; these use ``PK_Encryptor_EME``. The construction method is +simple; call + +.. cpp:function:: PK_Encryptor_EME::PK_Encryptor_EME(const Public_Key& key, std::string eme) + + With *key* being the key you want to encrypt messages to. The + padding method to use is specified in *eme*. + + The recommended values for *eme* is "EME1(SHA-1)" or + "EME1(SHA-256)". If you need compatability with protocols using the + PKCS #1 v1.5 standard, you can also use "EME-PKCS1-v1_5". + +The DLIES encryptor is defined in the header ``dlies.h``, and +is created by the constructor: + +.. cpp:function:: DLIES_Encryptor::DLIES_Encryptor(const PK_Key_Agreement_Key&, KDF* kdf, MessageAuthenticationCode* mac, size_t mac_key_len = 20) + + Where *kdf* is a :ref:`key_derivation_function` and *mac* is a + :ref:`message_auth_code`. + +The decryption classes are named ``PK_Decryptor``, +``PK_Decryptor_EME``, and ``DLIES_Decryptor``. They are created in the +exact same way, except they take the private key, and the processing +function is named ``decrypt``. -The ``PK_Encryptor`` and ``PK_Decryptor`` classes are the -interface for encryption and decryption, respectively. - -Calling ``encrypt`` with a ``byte`` array, a length -parameter, and an RNG object will return the input encrypted with -whatever scheme is being used. Calling the similar ``decrypt`` -will perform the inverse operation. You can also do these operations -with ``SecureVector<byte>``s. In all cases, the output is returned -via a ``SecureVector<byte>``. - -If you attempt an operation with a larger size than the key can -support (this limit varies based on the algorithm, the key size, and -the padding method used (if any)), an exception will be thrown. You -can call ``maximum_input_size`` to find out the maximum size -input (in bytes) that you can safely use with any particular key. - -Available public key encryption algorithms in Botan are RSA and -ElGamal. The encoding methods are EME1, denoted by "EME1(HASHNAME)", -PKCS #1 v1.5, called "PKCS1v15" or "EME-PKCS1-v1_5", and raw encoding -("Raw"). - -For compatibility reasons, PKCS #1 v1.5 is recommend for use with -ElGamal (most other implementations of ElGamal do not support any -other encoding format). RSA can also be used with PKCS # 1 encoding, -but because of various possible attacks, EME1 is the preferred -encoding. EME1 requires the use of a hash function: unless a competent -applied cryptographer tells you otherwise, you should use SHA-256 or -SHA-512. - -Don't use "Raw" encoding unless you need it for backward -compatibility with old protocols. There are many possible attacks -against both ElGamal and RSA when they are used in this way. Signatures --------------------------------- + The signature algorithms look quite a bit like the hash functions. You -can repeatedly call ``update``, giving more and more of a -message you wish to sign, and then call ``signature``, which -will return a signature for that message. If you want to do it all in -one shot, call ``sign_message``, which will just call -``update`` with its argument and then return whatever -``signature`` returns. Generating a signature requires random -numbers with some schemes, so ``signature`` and +can repeatedly call ``update``, giving more and more of a message you +wish to sign, and then call ``signature``, which will return a +signature for that message. If you want to do it all in one shot, call +``sign_message``, which will just call ``update`` with its argument +and then return whatever ``signature`` returns. Generating a signature +requires random numbers with some schemes, so ``signature`` and ``sign_message`` both take a ``RandomNumberGenerator&``. -You can validate a signature by updating the verifier class, and finally seeing -the if the value returned from ``check_signature`` is true (you pass -the supposed signature to the ``check_signature`` function as a byte -array and a length or as a ``MemoryRegion<byte>``). There is another -function, ``verify_message``, which takes a pair of byte array/length -pairs (or a pair of ``MemoryRegion<byte>`` objects), the first of which is -the message, the second being the (supposed) signature. It returns true if the -signature is valid and false otherwise. +You can validate a signature by updating the verifier class, and +finally seeing the if the value returned from ``check_signature`` is +true (you pass the supposed signature to the ``check_signature`` +function as a byte array and a length or as a +``MemoryRegion<byte>``). There is another function, +``verify_message``, which takes a pair of byte array/length pairs (or +a pair of ``MemoryRegion<byte>`` objects), the first of which is the +message, the second being the (supposed) signature. It returns true if +the signature is valid and false otherwise. Available public key signature algorithms in Botan are RSA, DSA, ECDSA, GOST-34.11, Nyberg-Rueppel, and Rabin-Williams. Signature |